Health Care Informatics Practice Exam

Image Description

Question: 1 / 400

Which method is used to gather clinical data when evaluating EBP guidelines?

Focus group discussions

Statistical analysis of outcomes

Using cohort samples of electronic data

Gathering clinical data when evaluating Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) guidelines is crucial for determining the effectiveness and applicability of those guidelines in real-world settings. Using cohort samples of electronic data offers a systematic way to gather extensive and representative data about patient outcomes and treatment effectiveness over time.

Cohort samples allow researchers to analyze data collected from groups of patients who share common characteristics or experiences, which is fundamental in assessing the impact of specific interventions or practices aligned with EBP guidelines. This method taps into existing electronic health records and databases, making it a resource-efficient means of obtaining large data sets that can demonstrate trends, variations, and outcomes in clinical practice. By leveraging electronic data, researchers are also able to conduct analyses that encompass diverse populations, thus enhancing the generalizability of their findings.

In contrast, other methods, such as focus group discussions, while valuable for qualitative insights, may not provide the quantitative data necessary to evaluate the actual outcomes associated with EBP guidelines. Similarly, statistical analysis of outcomes primarily relies on previously gathered data and does not necessarily encompass the initial data gathering phase. Longitudinal case studies, although insightful for understanding individual cases over time, may lack the breadth needed for a broad evaluation of EBP guidelines as they focus on specific instances rather

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Longitudinal case studies

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy